Talk:FreeMind 0.9.0: The New Features - Revision history

Dan Polansky: -posts by Aplatypus from Apr 2010; please repost to a forum if still relevant

2010-10-18T10:55:05Z

-posts by Aplatypus from Apr 2010; please repost to a forum if still relevant

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 --[[User:Uli|Uli]] 02:48, 13 Feb 2007 (PST)
 == Deleting attributes ==
 Thanks to Dimitri for indicating/recalling the correct way to delete attributes. I have added in the original section "deleting attributes" the full sequence to achieve this goal, as this was not obvious from the original doc for several reasons :

2010-10-18T10:50:29Z

redirect people to forums

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 18 October 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			This page is protected. Please post any suggestions and questions related to this page and to FreeMind to [http://sourceforge.net/projects/freemind/forums/forum/22101 Open Discussion] forum.

	==Helpfulness of this page==		==Helpfulness of this page==
	I'm finding most of the page rather unhelpful. The documentation jumps straight into explaining which buttons to press, without really explaining or even hinting why would I want to do that in the first place.		I'm finding most of the page rather unhelpful. The documentation jumps straight into explaining which buttons to press, without really explaining or even hinting why would I want to do that in the first place.

2010-10-18T10:48:06Z

+heading

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 18 October 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Helpfulness of this page==
	I'm finding most of the page rather unhelpful. The documentation jumps straight into explaining which buttons to press, without really explaining or even hinting why would I want to do that in the first place.		I'm finding most of the page rather unhelpful. The documentation jumps straight into explaining which buttons to press, without really explaining or even hinting why would I want to do that in the first place.

2010-10-18T10:47:05Z

remove last post: use forums

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 18 October 2010
Line 116:		Line 116:

	Just a thought. I actually came to the wiki after downloading rc7 to see what was new compared to rc6, and couldn't see any apparent answers, so I thought I would throw out the suggestion.		Just a thought. I actually came to the wiki after downloading rc7 to see what was new compared to rc6, and couldn't see any apparent answers, so I thought I would throw out the suggestion.

	~~== New export "twiki" layout ==~~

	Was it really needed to change the twiki exports and is there any possibility to put the old export in there as well? I am creating a program-analysing tool for schools where the twiki export was used with it's layout but now it all changed my code is kinda ruined. :)
	~~--[[User:Jordumus\|Jordumus]] 18:12, 15 Oct 2010 (UTC)~~

2010-10-15T18:12:30Z

New export "twiki" layout

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 15 October 2010
Line 120:		Line 120:

	Was it really needed to change the twiki exports and is there any possibility to put the old export in there as well? I am creating a program-analysing tool for schools where the twiki export was used with it's layout but now it all changed my code is kinda ruined. :)		Was it really needed to change the twiki exports and is there any possibility to put the old export in there as well? I am creating a program-analysing tool for schools where the twiki export was used with it's layout but now it all changed my code is kinda ruined. :)
			--[[User:Jordumus\|Jordumus]] 18:12, 15 Oct 2010 (UTC)

2010-10-15T16:14:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:14, 15 October 2010
Line 116:		Line 116:

	Just a thought. I actually came to the wiki after downloading rc7 to see what was new compared to rc6, and couldn't see any apparent answers, so I thought I would throw out the suggestion.		Just a thought. I actually came to the wiki after downloading rc7 to see what was new compared to rc6, and couldn't see any apparent answers, so I thought I would throw out the suggestion.

			== New export "twiki" layout ==

			Was it really needed to change the twiki exports and is there any possibility to put the old export in there as well? I am creating a program-analysing tool for schools where the twiki export was used with it's layout but now it all changed my code is kinda ruined. :)

2010-04-11T12:02:52Z

Talk topic on reporting errors

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 --[[User:Uli|Uli]] 02:48, 13 Feb 2007 (PST)
 == Deleting attributes ==
 Thanks to Dimitri for indicating/recalling the correct way to delete attributes. I have added in the original section "deleting attributes" the full sequence to achieve this goal, as this was not obvious from the original doc for several reasons :

2010-03-27T01:06:05Z

Incremental "What's New" Page?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 27 March 2010
Line 88:		Line 88:

	MarktersGeek		MarktersGeek

			== Incremental "What's New" Page? ==

			It seems like it might be a good idea to list the new features of each version.

			My general suggestion is to have an overview page (showing all the different releases, and maybe a little information about each), and then a page regarding a specific version.

			For instance, on the version overview page you would have .8 (and any subsequent versions, if applicable) .9, and the subsequent RC versions (rc 1-7) and perhaps a little information about each subversion (such as major features added/bug fixes). Then the label for the subversion would link to the subversion page, and this page would detail the current version. This would primarily consist of details of all bug fixes, features added, etc.

			Just a thought. I actually came to the wiki after downloading rc7 to see what was new compared to rc6, and couldn't see any apparent answers, so I thought I would throw out the suggestion.

2009-12-30T07:16:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, 30 December 2009
Line 86:		Line 86:

	Now, down to business. I s'pose the html set will find "attributes" a reasonable and understandable term. But, even as a member, more of that set than the social media set -- wouldn't the social media term "tags" (or the gmail concept "labels") fit better and be more quickly understandable?		Now, down to business. I s'pose the html set will find "attributes" a reasonable and understandable term. But, even as a member, more of that set than the social media set -- wouldn't the social media term "tags" (or the gmail concept "labels") fit better and be more quickly understandable?

			MarktersGeek

2009-12-30T07:14:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 30 December 2009
Line 82:		Line 82:

	--[[User:Ceefour\|Ceefour]] 05:08, 23 Jun 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Ceefour\|Ceefour]] 05:08, 23 Jun 2009 (UTC)

			Yes, Freemind definitely rocks. It's so speedy, I'm surprised to find that it uses Java!

			Now, down to business. I s'pose the html set will find "attributes" a reasonable and understandable term. But, even as a member, more of that set than the social media set -- wouldn't the social media term "tags" (or the gmail concept "labels") fit better and be more quickly understandable?