User feedback: Difference between revisions
From FreeMind
Jump to navigationJump to search
Dan Polansky (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dan Polansky (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
User feedback locations/sources, large number of user reviews/feedback posts: | User feedback locations/sources, large number of user reviews/feedback posts: | ||
* [http://sourceforge.net/projects/freemind/forums/forum/320015 Thank you for the music] forum, sourceforge.net | * [http://sourceforge.net/projects/freemind/forums/forum/320015 Thank you for the music] forum, sourceforge.net – Jan 2026: there are over 1370 threads, some of which have multiple posts; the oldest thread is from 8 Mar 2003. Given the number of threads is over 6 times the number of reviews below in "freemind/reviews", this is perhaps the most eminent/valuable source of positive/praiseful feedback. | ||
* [https://sourceforge.net/p/freemind/discussion/320014/ Complaints from users] forum, sourceforge.net | * [https://sourceforge.net/p/freemind/discussion/320014/ Complaints from users] forum, sourceforge.net – Jan 2026: there are over 1434 threads, some of which have multiple posts; the oldest thread is from 24 Oct 2003; somewhat duplicate to the bug tracker | ||
* [https://sourceforge.net/projects/freemind/reviews/ freemind/reviews], sourceforge.net | * [https://sourceforge.net/projects/freemind/reviews/ freemind/reviews], sourceforge.net – user reviews using SourceForge's dedicated tool; Jan 2026: there are over 230 reviews; this tool must have been added by SourceForge later than we created the "Thank you for the music" and "Complaints from users" forums | ||
As above but small number of reviews/feedback posts: | As above but small number of reviews/feedback posts: | ||
* [https://www.capterra.com/p/176867/FreeMind/reviews/ FreeMind views], capterra.com | * [https://www.capterra.com/p/176867/FreeMind/reviews/ FreeMind views], capterra.com – Jan 2026: 18 reviews | ||
* [https://community.linuxmint.com/software/view/freemind freemind], community.linuxmint.com | * [https://community.linuxmint.com/software/view/freemind freemind], community.linuxmint.com – Jan 2026: 20 reviews | ||
* [https://freemind.en.softonic.com/ FreeMind], softonic.com | * [https://freemind.en.softonic.com/ FreeMind], softonic.com – Jan 2026: 10 reviews | ||
Secondary soures: | Secondary soures: | ||
* [[Main Page#Testimonials]] | * [[Main Page#Testimonials]] – this page section links to the above two items | ||
See also: | See also: | ||
* [[Reviews]] | * [[Reviews]] – somewhat duplicate, but it focuses on individual review articles rather than on review collectings pages | ||
[[Category:Main]] | [[Category:Main]] | ||
Revision as of 11:46, 26 January 2026
This page is intended to identify in which locations user feedback on FreeMind (not FreeMind wiki) can be found, in largest volumes.
User feedback locations/sources, large number of user reviews/feedback posts:
- Thank you for the music forum, sourceforge.net – Jan 2026: there are over 1370 threads, some of which have multiple posts; the oldest thread is from 8 Mar 2003. Given the number of threads is over 6 times the number of reviews below in "freemind/reviews", this is perhaps the most eminent/valuable source of positive/praiseful feedback.
- Complaints from users forum, sourceforge.net – Jan 2026: there are over 1434 threads, some of which have multiple posts; the oldest thread is from 24 Oct 2003; somewhat duplicate to the bug tracker
- freemind/reviews, sourceforge.net – user reviews using SourceForge's dedicated tool; Jan 2026: there are over 230 reviews; this tool must have been added by SourceForge later than we created the "Thank you for the music" and "Complaints from users" forums
As above but small number of reviews/feedback posts:
- FreeMind views, capterra.com – Jan 2026: 18 reviews
- freemind, community.linuxmint.com – Jan 2026: 20 reviews
- FreeMind, softonic.com – Jan 2026: 10 reviews
Secondary soures:
- Main Page#Testimonials – this page section links to the above two items
See also:
- Reviews – somewhat duplicate, but it focuses on individual review articles rather than on review collectings pages
