Talk:Release process: Difference between revisions
From FreeMind
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
IMO it would be better to avoid creation of Windows installers for beta versions. Windows installer is meant for productive use. It makes the installation convenient and straightforward to the novices, who should be discouraged from using beta versions, not only through textual announcements, but also through technology. Isn't it? --[[User:Danielpolansky|Danielpolansky]] 06:14, 27 Jun 2007 (PDT) | IMO it would be better to avoid creation of Windows installers for beta versions. Windows installer is meant for productive use. It makes the installation convenient and straightforward to the novices, who should be discouraged from using beta versions, not only through textual announcements, but also through technology. Isn't it? --[[User:Danielpolansky|Danielpolansky]] 06:14, 27 Jun 2007 (PDT) | ||
: A similar line of reasoning probably also holds for Mac and Debian installers. --[[User:Danielpolansky|Danielpolansky]] 06:15, 27 Jun 2007 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:15, 27 June 2007
Windows installer for beta
IMO it would be better to avoid creation of Windows installers for beta versions. Windows installer is meant for productive use. It makes the installation convenient and straightforward to the novices, who should be discouraged from using beta versions, not only through textual announcements, but also through technology. Isn't it? --Danielpolansky 06:14, 27 Jun 2007 (PDT)
- A similar line of reasoning probably also holds for Mac and Debian installers. --Danielpolansky 06:15, 27 Jun 2007 (PDT)
