Talk:Import and export: Difference between revisions
From FreeMind
Jump to navigationJump to search
(vym conversion XSLT doesn't work with xsltproc?) |
(Added Xalan error message) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== vym conversion XSLT doesn't work with xsltproc? == | == vym conversion XSLT doesn't work with xsltproc and Xalan-c? == | ||
On my OpenSuse 10.2 box, the vym->FreeMind stylesheet when run with xsltproc from xmlsoft.org, complains about the @url test: | On my OpenSuse 10.2 box, the vym->FreeMind stylesheet when run with xsltproc from xmlsoft.org, complains about the @url test: | ||
<code> | |||
XPath error : Invalid expression | XPath error : Invalid expression | ||
compilation error: file /tmp/vym2freemind.xslt line 23 element if | compilation error: file /tmp/vym2freemind.xslt line 23 element if | ||
xsl:if : could not compile test expression '@url != ' | xsl:if : could not compile test expression '@url != ' | ||
</code> | |||
When trying the same with Xalan-c 1.10.0 (Xerces 2.7.0), I get: | |||
<code> | |||
XPathParserException: Expected a token but reached the end of the expression instead. | |||
expression = '@url != ' Remaining tokens are: ( '=') (/tmp/vym2freemind.xslt, line 23, column 27) | |||
</code> | |||
Which XSLT processor was the stylesheet designed to work with? | |||
--[[User:Akaihola|Akaihola]] 01:36, 31 May 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:36, 31 May 2007
vym conversion XSLT doesn't work with xsltproc and Xalan-c?
On my OpenSuse 10.2 box, the vym->FreeMind stylesheet when run with xsltproc from xmlsoft.org, complains about the @url test:
XPath error : Invalid expression
compilation error: file /tmp/vym2freemind.xslt line 23 element if
xsl:if : could not compile test expression '@url != '
When trying the same with Xalan-c 1.10.0 (Xerces 2.7.0), I get:
XPathParserException: Expected a token but reached the end of the expression instead.
expression = '@url != ' Remaining tokens are: ( '=') (/tmp/vym2freemind.xslt, line 23, column 27)
Which XSLT processor was the stylesheet designed to work with? --Akaihola 01:36, 31 May 2007 (PDT)
